Home
Events
Community Events Calendar
Funding News
Topical Tips
Links
Contact Us

Newark & Sherwood Funding Issues Group

Topical Tips

This page will point you to topical items relating to funding, fundraising or bid writing and other items of general news which is relevant to charity money management.

47% of new Awards for All applications being returned!

Since the changes to the structure of Awards for All, 47% of the applications received have been returned to the applicants because they are incomplete. If you are applying to this fund - or any other - please ensure that:

  • You have a project - believe it or not some people have recently attended an event enquirig about applying for money with no project in mind!

  • You and your project are eligible for the fund you are applying to e.g. you are not asking for too much money - or too little

  • You have completed all questions. Read the guidelines. If a question does not apply to you you will most likely need to say why, not just ignore it. If you are asked to send enclosures, please ensure they are included and any absences adequately explained. Awards for All are now returning incomplete applications, not just asking for missing information.

48% of Grant Applications are Ineligible

Research carried out by the Directory of Social Changes’ governmentfunding.org.uk team showed that for central government grant programmes an average of 48% were found to be ineligible at the first assessment stage.

Not poor quality, not bad ideas, not the wrong focus or too expensive or unlikely to succeed: ineligible.

Problems included organisations based in Wales applying for funds only available to English organisations, non-charitable groups applying for funds only accessible to registered charities and applications for £100,000 to funds with a clear limit of £20,000.

Applicants are constantly reminded by grantmakers and advice organisations to “read the guidance” but in many cases the message fails to get through. In some it is completely ignored. Some applications even start off with the sentence “I know you don’t usually fund this project but -”. They go straight in the bin. Unsurprisingly the funder who reported this expressed frustration less that they aren’t eligible, but that they read the guidance, note that the trust doesn’t (and won’t) fund them, and apply anyway. To read more click here.

 

Please don't be one of these organisations wasting both your own time ant that of the grant makers. The Funding Issues Group can help you target the most suitable potential funders for your project. Click here to contact us.

 

Charities are not Businesses

by Debra Allcock Tyler, Chief Executive, Directory of Social Change

We may have robust financial management systems, sophisticated strategic planning, audited annual accounts, paid employees and detailed organisational policies.  We may even generate our own income through trading.  But we're not businesses.
We’re not businesses because the Charities Act does not allow us to be, because the rules on public benefit do not allow us to be; because our charitable objects do not allow us to be.
There is one key fundamental difference. 

The purpose of a business is to make a profit.  However, that is not the purpose of charity. For charities, money is only ever the means and for around 150,000 charities (those with turnovers under £100k pa), it’s not even that much of a means.  For us, money is a tool to help us serve our beneficiaries or deliver against our cause, and that is all.  And when we forget that then we have not just lost the point – we’ve lost the plot.
The differences between the two sectors have nothing to do with the people and everything to do with the legal frameworks in which we operate.  It’s the law that keeps charities charitable.
Interestingly, many people assume that the business way of doing things is the right or best way and that charities aren’t good at running themselves.

We need to keep good records; have effective communication systems, have plans to help us meet our vision and charitable objects; have appropriate governance and monitoring systems.  All with the purpose of meeting our charitable objects.  We need to be constantly looking at how we can improve and do things better.

The business model doesn’t even work for businesses, why on earth would we genuinely believe it works for us?

To read the full article click here.

And here's another benefit to not being businesses:

Consider Spending Reserves to Beat the Recession

Charities should consider spending reserves to maintain core services and management capacity during recession says Mike Hudson, author of 'Managing Without Profit', a guide to leading, managing and governing third sector organisations.

“The third sector is better placed to overcome the recession than the private sector because its business model is based on holding reserves, not on borrowing. Reserves exist as a buffer so now may be the time to use them so that you are well positioned for the inevitable upturn,” he said.

“Board members and managers must recognise that reserves exist to cushion organisations when times are tough. If income is one of the determinants of a reserves policy and the organisation is anticipating a temporary fall, then reserves can be dipped into to ensure long term success.”

But Hudson warns that accessing reserves should not be employed as a strategy to avoid tough decisions.

“Managers must still find efficiency savings and pursue opportunities to form new strategic partnerships, such as merging back office functions with other organisations. These decisions can be taken boldly in the current climate.”

Mike Hudson offers advice on managing strategic partnerships and mergers in the third edition of Managing Without Profit, launched on Thursday 19 February. To read more, click here.
 

Gift Aid 'Opt-Out' Scheme

The Treasury has agreed to look at developing an ‘opt-out’ scheme for gift aid. This follows further discussion with the third sector on a consultation exercise on improving gift-aid take up which had earlier been dismissed as too complex.

The Treasury has agreed to consider an ‘opt-out’ system which would mean instead of donors having to give permission for the tax they paid on donations to go to charity, it would go to charity automatically unless a donor objected.

The Treasury said it hoped to bring in any changes before the 2010 Budget in order to support the sector through the recession. Click here for more information.